MSR

Stack Overflow is the de facto Question and Answer (Q&A) website for developers, and it has been used in many approaches by software engineering researchers to mine useful data. However, the contents of a Stack Overflow discussion are inherently heterogeneous, mixing natural language, source code, stack traces and configuration files in XML or JSON format. We constructed a full island grammar capable of modeling the set of 700,000 Stack Overflow discussions talking about Java, building a heterogeneous abstract syntax tree (H-AST) of each post (question, answer or comment) in a discussion. The resulting dataset models every Stack Overflow discussion, providing a full H-AST for each type of structured fragment (i.e., JSON, XML, Java, Stack traces), and complementing this information with a set of basic meta-information like term frequency to enable natural language analyses. Our dataset allows the end-user to perform combined analyses of the Stack Overflow by visiting the H-AST of a discussion.

Summarization is hailed as a promising approach to reduce the amount of information that must be taken in by the person who wants to understand development artifacts, such as pieces of code, bug reports, emails, etc. However, existing approaches treat artifacts as pure textual entities, disregarding the heterogeneous and partially structured nature of most artifacts, which contain intertwined pieces of distinct type, such as source code, diffs, stack traces, human language, etc. We present a novel approach to augment existing summarization techniques (such as LexRank) to deal with the heterogeneous and multidimensional nature of complex artifacts. Our preliminary results on heterogeneous artifacts suggest our approach outperforms the current text-based approaches.

One of the fundamental principles of open-source projects is that they foster collaboration among developers, disregarding their geographical location or personal background. When it comes to software repositories collaboration is a rather ephemeral phenomenon which lacks a clear definition, and it must therefore be mined and modeled. This throws up the question whether what is mined actually maps to reality. In this paper we investigate collaboration by modeling it using a number of diverse approaches that we then compare to a ground truth obtained by surveying a substantial set of developers of the Pharo open-source community. Our findings indicate that the notion of collaboration must be revisited, as it is undermined by a number of factors that are often tackled in imprecise ways or not taken into account at all.